Law Firm News
Today's Legal News Bookmark This Website
Supreme Court rules for nursing home patient’s family
Legal News Source | 2023/06/29 11:33
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for the family of a nursing home resident with dementia that had sued over his care, declining to use the case to broadly limit the right to sue government workers.

The man’s family went to court alleging that he was given drugs to keep him easier to manage in violation of his rights. The justices had been asked to use his case to limit the ability of people to use a federal law to sue for civil rights violations. That outcome could have left tens of millions of people participating in federal programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, without an avenue to go to court to enforce their rights.

The Supreme Court has previously said that a section of federal law — “Section 1983” — broadly gives people the right to sue state and local governments when their employees violate rights created by any federal statute.

The court by a 7-2 vote reiterated that Thursday, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson writing that Section 1983 “can presumptively be used to enforce unambiguously conferred federal individual rights.” Both liberal and conservative justices joined her majority opinion while conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

The court had been asked to say that when Congress creates a federal spending program — giving states money to provide services such as Medicare and Medicaid — they shouldn’t face lawsuits from individuals under Section 1983. The court rejected that invitation.

The specific case the justices heard involves the interaction of Section 1983 and the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act, a 1987 law that outlines requirements for nursing homes that accept federal Medicare and Medicaid funds. The court was being asked to answer whether a person can use Section 1983 to go to court with claims their rights under the nursing home act are violated. The answer is yes, the court said.


[PREV] [1] ..[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85].. [2376] [NEXT]
All (2376)
Law Firm Legal News (289)
Court News Resource (406)
Legal Current Events (410)
Attorney News Feed (483)
Legal News Source (266)
Trending Legal Topics (284)
Legal Opinions (111)
Law Articles (97)
Court Press Release (27)
TikTok content creators sue ..
Abortion consumes US politic..
Trump faces prospect of addi..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein ..
Starbucks appears likely to ..
Supreme Court will weigh ban..
Biden is seeking higher tari..
Korean Air Pilot Benefits - ..
Top Europe rights court cond..
Elon Musk will be investigat..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Chicago Truck Drivers Lawyer
Chicago Workers' Comp Attorneys
www.krol-law.com
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
NC Business Law Attorney
Corporate Litigation Attorneys
www.rothlawgroup.com
Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
Divorce Lawyer & Family Law Attorney
Divorce lawyer rockville
familylawyersmd.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
   Law Firm Blog Links
  Law Firm Planner
  Law Firm Directory
  Law Firm News
 
 
© www.headlinelegalnews.com. All rights reserved.

The articles and contents posted on the website have been prepared by Headline Legal News as a courtesy to the internet community and any one interested in legal matters. It is not to be constituted as legal advice or act as legal consultation with a licensed attorney in a specific matter or legal circumstance. Headline Legal News postings and comments shown are available for educational purposes only and are not meant to be used to assess any specific legal situation, matter, or circumstance. Family Law Attorney Web Design.