Law Firm News
Today's Legal News Bookmark This Website
Appeals court reverses ruling that found NSA program illegal
Legal News Source | 2015/08/28 14:38
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled in favor of the Obama administration in a dispute over the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone data on hundreds of millions of Americans.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed a lower court ruling that said the program likely violates the Constitution's ban on unreasonable searches.

But the impact of the appeals court's ruling is uncertain because Congress has passed legislation designed to replace the program over the next few months. The appeals court sent the case back for a judge to determine what further details about the program the government must provide.

The ruling is the latest in a succession of decisions in federal courts in Washington and New York that at various points threatened the constitutionality of the NSA's surveillance program, but have so far upheld the amassing of records from U.S. domestic phone customers.

The appeals court ruled that challengers to the program have not shown "a substantial likelihood" that they will win their case on the merits.

Judge Janice Rogers Brown said it was possible the government would refuse to provide information that could help the challengers win their case. In a separate opinion, Judge Stephen Williams said the challengers would need to show they actually were targeted by the surveillance program.

Judge David Sentelle dissented in part, saying he would have thrown the case out entirely because the plaintiffs offered no proof they were ever harmed.

All three judges were appointees of Republican presidents.

The lawsuit was brought by Larry Klayman, a conservative lawyer, and Charles Strange, the father of a cryptologist technician who was killed in Afghanistan when his helicopter was shot down in 2011. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled in 2013 that the collection was likely unconstitutional, but he put that decision on hold pending a government appeal.



[PREV] [1] ..[1337][1338][1339][1340][1341][1342][1343][1344][1345].. [2376] [NEXT]
All (2376)
Law Firm Legal News (289)
Court News Resource (406)
Legal Current Events (410)
Attorney News Feed (483)
Legal News Source (266)
Trending Legal Topics (284)
Legal Opinions (111)
Law Articles (97)
Court Press Release (27)
TikTok content creators sue ..
Abortion consumes US politic..
Trump faces prospect of addi..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein ..
Starbucks appears likely to ..
Supreme Court will weigh ban..
Biden is seeking higher tari..
Korean Air Pilot Benefits - ..
Top Europe rights court cond..
Elon Musk will be investigat..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Chicago Truck Drivers Lawyer
Chicago Workers' Comp Attorneys
www.krol-law.com
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
NC Business Law Attorney
Corporate Litigation Attorneys
www.rothlawgroup.com
Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
Divorce Lawyer & Family Law Attorney
Divorce lawyer rockville
familylawyersmd.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
   Law Firm Blog Links
  Law Firm Planner
  Law Firm Directory
  Law Firm News
 
 
© www.headlinelegalnews.com. All rights reserved.

The articles and contents posted on the website have been prepared by Headline Legal News as a courtesy to the internet community and any one interested in legal matters. It is not to be constituted as legal advice or act as legal consultation with a licensed attorney in a specific matter or legal circumstance. Headline Legal News postings and comments shown are available for educational purposes only and are not meant to be used to assess any specific legal situation, matter, or circumstance. Family Law Attorney Web Design.